In 2007, the Oakland A’s won four more games than the Chicago White Sox won. Both teams had years that were below expectations and which most considered a disappointment.
And both teams play in two-team markets and play second fiddle to their National League counterparts. The A’s have remained in the shadow of the Giants, despite having won four championships to the Giants’ zero. And the White Sox World Series win just three seasons ago hasn’t done much to help them take over Chicago from the lovable loser Cubs.
And both play in divisions with tough opponents who have gotten better this offseason. The Angels have added pitching in the form of Jon Garland and acquired Torii Hunter for the outfield. In the AL Central, the White Sox have to compete with the Tigers who added Miguel Cabrera and Dontrelle Willis, and the talented Indians, who were in the ALCS last year.
So what’s a team like the A’s and the White Sox to do? Make some moves to get better and improve on last year? Or tear it all down and start over? Based on last week’s trade, as well as moves prior to that, we know who’s doing what. Let’s take a closer look at these teams’ strategies going into ‘08.
The White Sox model
The Sox had one of the worst offenses in baseball last year - even worse than the A’s. So they beefed it up this offseason by getting shortstop Orlando Cabrera and then Nick Swisher. But at what expense? An established starting pitcher in John Garland was swapped for Cabrera, and two top pitching prospects and a mediocre outfield prospect for Swisher.
Kenny Williams certainly is hoping to compete in 2008:
“From the first day I was assigned this position, I’ve been in the win mode. I’m worried about the 2008 championship before winning a title in 2010 and 2011, when these [traded] players will be ready to contribute on a championship team.
But are Orlando Cabrera and Nick Swisher enough to compete with Miguel Cabrera, Dontrelle Willis, and the Detroit Tigers? Or last year’s AL Central champion Indians, for that matter?
Andrew Reilly at South Side Baseball thinks the Sox may have turned what could have been a bright future into more mediocrity. I tend to agree with him. Of course, the White Sox could go 110-52 and Swisher could win the AL MVP. But I wouldn’t bet my Nick Swisher belt buckle (if I had one) on it.
The A’s model
Tear it down and start over - that’s what the A’s are doing this offseason with the trades of Dan Haren and then Swisher. It’s enough to make even the most loyal A’s fans question the dealings of the GM we’ve grown to trust over the last 10 years. But the fact is, Billy just wants to stay one step ahead of everyone else:
“I got off the plane from the winter meetings, I said to David, ‘Who are we kidding?’ We can’t let hope be our strategy here. That’s what we’re doing. … We can’t waste another year. If this needs to be done, it needs to be done.”
“Our status quo as we stood going into the season was mediocrity at best. That’s my opinion. If anything we’re taking a step back with the idea we have a chance to build something very good for a long time. … The cost of indecision for us probably would be a bigger mistake.”
Not satisfied with mediocrity, Billy would rather piss off the casual fans for the short term in the hopes of gaining them back in the long term, with the help of a new stadium in Fremont.
Attendance will be awful this year, and we’ll have to sit through some lopsided games at the A’s expense. But I would rather have it be done this way, as we expect it and nothing more. Had Billy stayed the course, there would have been hope to compete and the disappointment that comes with not doing so.
So keep your eye on these two teams over the next few years. We’ll see who gets back to the top first.