Today is an off day, so here are some things that are on my mind today:
1. Everywhere I read,
speculation is that the A’s are in for a major overhaul this offsesaon. Joe Blanton’s name has already been out there since the non-waiver trade deadline. So has Huston Street’s. And in the past week I’ve seen Eric Chavez’s name brought up as a possible trading chip, most recently today on Buster Olney’s ESPN.com blog:
Because Chavez’s salary represents between 10 and 12 percent of Oakland’s entire payroll, he is something of an albatross to the Athletics. It makes sense for them to move him.
But he would be a very nice luxury item for a large-budget contender — he bears some risk, but he’s not outrageously priced, has loads of big-game experience, and is known as a good clubhouse guy. He would make a lot of sense for the Dodgers, in their never-ending quest for a third baseman; for the Yankees, if Alex Rodriguez decides, in the end, to opt out of his contract; or the Red Sox, if they want an alternative to giving Mike Lowell a three-year deal.
Emotionally, it’s a sad thought, as Chavez is our longest-tenured A and has been a joy to watch at third base over the years. Who’d be the longest-tenured A then? Mark Ellis, with his April 9, 2002 A’s debut.
But of course, the payroll flexibility would be huge. What would the A’s do with it? My mind spins at the possibilities. Lock up the afore-mentioned Ellis in his vastly underrated glory? Use it to go get a real shortstop? Save it for the eventual raises Travis Buck and Kurt Suzuki will earn?
At this point, I say if it can be done,
do it. It feels sad the further we get away from the 2000-2003 teams, but this team isn’t going anywhere but down in its current state.
2. The Esteban Loaiza departure kind of goes together with#1. A couple of things here:
a) I was wrong in my statement yesterday when I said the A’s would be off the hook for $8.5 million of E-Lo’s salary. Really, they’re only saving about $6 million, as they will still owe him his $1 million signing bonus.
b) One speculation that came up in light of the move yesterday was that there may be a “goodwill” deal between the A’s and Dodgers this offseason. Perhaps the teams made a verbal agreement that they will make a deal this winter that favors the A’s.
The more I read about it and think about it, I think I’ll feel like the A’s got hosed if there is no swap between those two teams this offseason. Could it be that whatever snagged the Joe Blanton talks at the trade deadline won’t snag it and the deal will go through? Could it be something involving Chavez? Could it be something small-scale? Could A’s fans be getting their hopes up for nothing? I can’t wait til December to find out.
3. Loaiza’s departure also opens up another spot in the rotation. Colby Lewis was called up to take his spot, but will it really be him who takes the ball Saturday against Detroit? What about Dallas Braden, he of the 17-strikeout performance in AAA this week? Or will Dan Meyer get another shot?
What puts a wrinkle into plans for a month-long fifth starter tryout is the PCL playoffs. The Rivercats are one win away from a division title, so the A’s might be inclined to let them keep their good pitchers as they make their playoff run. We all know the A’s don’t have that luxury, so why not let the kids make a run at it?
4. If your team has only won one game in a row, can it be considered a streak? I say yes. It says “W-1″ under the streak column in the standings, so it has to count.
Enjoy the off day and our current winning streak.